PRISM INTELLIGENCE NETWORK — CLEARANCE LEVEL: OPEN SOURCESYSTEM OPERATIONAL
←Intelligence Feed
● HIGHgeopoliticalJul 18, 2026CONFIDENCE: 75%

Iranian official says the policy of negotiating during war is over

The statement by Iranian official Mohsen Rezaee marks a significant shift in Iran's approach to negotiations with the US, particularly in the context of ongoing military tensions. This development has strategic importance as it may indicate a potential escalation of conflict between Iran and the US, with possible involvement from Israel. The abandonment of negotiations during wartime could lead to increased instability in the region, affecting global energy markets and security dynamics.

Intelligence Analysis

Intelligence Report

STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE

The statement by Iranian official Mohsen Rezaee marks a significant shift in Iran's approach to negotiations with the US, particularly in the context of ongoing military tensions. This development has strategic importance as it may indicate a potential escalation of conflict between Iran and the US, with possible involvement from Israel. The abandonment of negotiations during wartime could lead to increased instability in the region, affecting global energy markets and security dynamics.

KEY ACTORS AND INTERESTS

The primary actors involved are Iran, the US, and Israel. Iran's goal is to deter further US aggression and protect its national interests. The US, potentially in collaboration with Israel, aims to exert pressure on Iran to comply with its demands, possibly related to nuclear proliferation or regional influence. Mohsen Rezaee, as a senior military advisor, plays a crucial role in shaping Iran's military strategy and response to external threats.

IMMEDIATE IMPLICATIONS

In the short term, this event may lead to an escalation of military strikes between the US and Iran, potentially drawing in Israel. The cessation of negotiations could also lead to a breakdown in diplomatic channels, making it more challenging to resolve the conflict peacefully. The immediate implications will be felt in the Middle East, with potential ripple effects on global energy markets and international relations.

RISK ASSESSMENT

The risk level associated with this event is MEDIUM to HIGH. The escalation of military conflict between the US and Iran could have far-reaching consequences, including disruptions to global energy supplies, increased terrorism, and destabilization of the region. The involvement of Israel could further complicate the situation, potentially drawing in other regional actors.

ANALYST NOTES

It is essential to consider the historical context of US-Iran relations, including previous attempts at negotiating a peace deal. The fact that Iran has limited its retaliations so far suggests that Tehran may be seeking to avoid all-out war. However, the statement by Mohsen Rezaee indicates a potential shift in Iran's strategy, which could lead to increased tensions and conflict. The confidence score for this analysis is 0.8, based on the quality of the information provided and the understanding of the historical context.

Forward Scenarios
Most Likely55%

* - Outcome (Probability: 55%) Description: Increased military posturing and indirect conflict between Iran and the US, with a focus on proxy wars and cyberattacks. Iran will likely intensify its support for regional allies, while the US will maintain its military presence in the region. Key Indicators to Watch: Increased drone attacks, cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, and heightened rhetoric from both sides. Timeframe: Next 2-3 months.

Alternative30%

(Probability: 30%) Description: A temporary freeze in hostilities, with backchannel negotiations between Iran and the US. This could be facilitated by a third-party mediator, such as the EU or China. Key Indicators to Watch: Reduced military activity, secret meetings between Iranian and US officials, and statements from third-party mediators. Timeframe: Next 1-2 months. Conditions for Change: A significant shift in the US administration's policy or a major regional crisis that necessitates coo

Tail Risk15%

(Probability: 15%) Description: A direct military confrontation between Iran and the US, potentially triggered by a miscalculation or an Israeli operation against Iranian targets. This could lead to a rapid escalation of conflict, drawing in other regional actors. Key Indicators to Watch: Large-scale military mobilization, direct attacks on US or Iranian assets, and a significant increase in oil prices. Timeframe: Next 1-3 months. This scenario is considered low-probability but high-impact, wi

Timeframe: 1-3 months
Historical Context

Related past articles from our database:

- What still needs to be negotiated in US-Iran ‘peace deal’? (Al Jazeera)

- Iran war live: US, Tehran signal peace deal within reach but not signed yet (Al Jazeera)

- Iran war live: Trump claims Tehran deal ‘approved’, cancels new strikes (Al Jazeera)

PRISM INTELLIGENCE BRIEFModel: qwen-qwq-32b